Christ stilling the waves June 2013 111

The

Trumpeteer

We are restarting our blog page in order to be able to inform our readers about news items from the secular or religious world that need to be more widely seen or commentated about.

 

We stopped it almost exactly two years ago, when we were asked by Bishop McGee to stop blogging; (under threat against Fr. Stephen's priestly faculties).

 

We had earlier that year, told Bishop Gilbert that we would stop blogging if he wished us to, but at that time he was happy for us to continue.

 

However, we were under two different dioceses due to living in a different diocese to that in which Fr. Stephen is incardinated.

 

Now however, the world and the Churches are descending ever further into a moral morass. And as we have ended our obedience to Pope Francis - and therefore all Bishops who go along with his false teachings and example - we are free to do what we must do under God. Preach God's Truth to the people, in season and out of season, so that those who have ears to hear may turn back to God and be saved.

 

For details on why we have removed our obedience please read our Declaration and footnotes.

By The Hermits, Aug 1 2019 01:59PM

Unborn babies in Britain need us to rise up from our unhappy slumber and fight for their lives as we did not do fiercely enough 50 years ago.


And it is extremely urgent.


We have, 'Right to Life UK' estimate, less than three months in which to stop the pro-abortion cabel in Parliament (Diane Johnson etc) from bringing in abortion to birth, basically the de-regulation of abortion, into England, Wales and Scotland. It will then be freescale killing of unborn babies for any reason or none.

It is already shocking that the disabled here are able to be killed up to birth - discrimination of the very worse type!

But what is being proposed now will also allow those without health problems to be killed, which will swell the number of late term abortions greatly.

And all because the pregnant mother doesn't want, for some reason or the other, to give birth at that time, because of course it is the women's right to choose! Female babies apparently not awarded this right until after they are born! There will be some women who also will have late abortions not because it is their 'right to chose' but because they are being pressurised by family or partner, or because they are poor. These two last categories of pregnant mothers need help and support, not just an operation to kill their child as if that will solve all their problems.


I feel guilty, so guilty.

I always knew what abortion was, how evil it was. But after attending the first anti-abortion march in London with my mother when I was twelve years old, I never did enough to fight for abortion to be ended.

I supported the various efforts to lower the age for abortion, I spoke about it to others in private, and it informed my choice when voting. I did try to stop two hospitals I worked at from allowing the nurses in Accident and Emergency departments from being able to give out the 'morning after pill', but I was unsuccessful in both. But I could have done more, so much more; and for that I am guilty before God. I also suspect that many of the people reading this could also have done more. Well now is the time for us to put that right.


Abortion is a very personal issue for me, because I am a surviver of an abortion attempt by a Gynaecologist. I survived because my mother thought that she was giving up her life by refusing to obey the gynaecologist.

I have four older brothers, and during my mother's pregnancies she suffered repeated kidney failures. I was a surprise, conceived during her concern at her mother's final illness. Due to her previous problems during pregnancy she was seen early by the Gynaecologist, but her kidneys were already failing. At the end of the consultation he told her that I was probably fatally flawed and would not survive, and that she would also not survive, and therefore an abortion was necessary. Although it was before the 'Abortion Act' his actions were legal under UK law.

My mother refused, but he sent her away to reconsider with his final words ringing in her ears: "Remember, you will leave your four boys motherless!"

My parents had no doubt what they should do, even thougth they thought it would cost my mother her life. When they returned to the hospital the Gynaecologist, although strongly disagreeing with their decision, said that he would do all in his power to keep my mother alive until the seventh month, and if she was still alive then he would do a caesarian, incase he could save either her or me. So my parents decided that they would give my brothers happy memories of the last few months of their mother's life, apparently no one was told off for four months! They also prayed as only children can pray!

At the seven month appointment the Gynaecologist was confounded. Mother's kidneys were working perfectly and I was growing well. He apparently said that if the boys had been praying then tell them to keep it up. So I was not killed in the Royal Victoria Hospital in Folkestone Kent.

Many years later I was appointed as an Accident and Emergency Consultant at Ashford Kent. One of the peripheral units under my care was the minor injury unit at the Royal Victoria Hospital Folkestone, and God was good enough to me to allow me to save the lives of a few people in the very same hospital in which I should have been killed! The irony of it always pleased me.


So I would beg all readers to do something extra in this, our vulnerable little ones, time of need.

What you can do, what we can do, I do not know.

Everybody has different skills, has different contacts, a few may only be able to pray, but most of us can at least tell people what is happening.

The official media will not be informing anybody anything! Whatever you do, do something!


I am attaching below the article by "Right to Life" for your further information.


Sr. Colette


...............................


(the e-mail from Right to Life UK)


THEIR NEXT TARGET: ENGLAND AND WALES


A matter of minutes after this horrific abortion regime had been voted through in the Commons, pro-abortion MP Diana Johnson was back up speaking in the chamber on their next move. She made it clear that England and Wales now have an abortion law that is 'out of line' with Northern Ireland's new 'progressive' law and made it clear that the abortion lobby would be moving the campaign focus back to England and Wales.


The abortion lobby are not hiding the fact that they will be seeking to introduce an abortion regime that is at least as bad as Northern Ireland's, if not worse. Remember that they have indicated that their ultimate goal here is to have abortion on demand, for any reason, up to birth. If there is any indication that they feel they can get this proposal through Parliament, it's very likely they will be aiming for abortion up to birth, rather the 28-week cut-off proposed in Northern Ireland.


They are going to be bringing forward an amendment to the Domestic Abuse Bill to introduce their radical proposals. This Bill has just had its first reading in Parliament and amendments will be brought forward later at Committee stage. We expect the abortion lobby's extreme abortion amendment to be tabled in September or October.


WE'RE HIRING


This is an imminent threat that we will face very soon. We are therefore well underway on our preparations for a very strong national campaign to oppose these radical proposals.


We will be facing the biggest battle on abortion since 1967.


We need to ensure we have the capacity in place to defeat these proposals. We are therefore looking for hard-working, passionate, professional individuals to join us to ensure we have the team in place to win. This team will then move onto a large push across media, public affairs and grassroots to deliver positive changes to policy and culture which will save lives and support women in unplanned pregnancies.


We are seeking both permanent staff and those who are available for a short-term contract for a fixed period of time ahead of the threat coming forward this Autumn (September/October).


If this is of interest to you or you know of anyone that would be suitable for one of the positions, please click the link below to view the positions we are looking to hire for and how to apply. We are moving quickly on getting the team together, so applications close Tuesday 6th August at 5pm.


If you can help us get the word out about these positions to friends, family and your wider networks, please do. It is vital that we can get the best team possible together ahead of this big battle.


Thank you again for your ongoing support.


Catherine Robinson

Right To Life UK


Their e-mail is: careers@righttolife.org.uk





By The Hermits, Jul 25 2019 04:31PM

Two articles about the more unseen issues about the LGBT agenda. The first is a very personal article written by a 'reformed' homosexual. The second shows that the medical treatment such as given to young children here in Britain is very suspect, and now at last the medical profession is starting to look at the drugs that it is giving these poor confused children.


These articles are so clear that I do not have to comment further!


Beauty queen speaks the truth: ‘Coming out as conservative is harder than coming out as gay’


July 23, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — When a beauty queen was stripped of her Miss Michigan title because her old social media postings were deemed “offensive, insensitive and inappropriate,” she declared, “Coming out as a conservative is way harder than coming out as gay in today's society.”


Kathy Zhu tweeted a screenshot last Friday of an email she had received from the pageant’s governing organization, explaining that her title had been revoked after tweets had been discovered concerning her “refusal to try on a hijab.”

The Miss World America Organization strips conservative activist Kathy Zhu of her Miss Michigan title for refusing to Wear Hijab and “insensitive” social media posts.


“It is honestly sad that the left refers to statistics and facts as racist and insensitive,” Zhu said in a statement to The Independent, UK.

“I am very glad that I now have the opportunity to speak out about the unjust treatment of conservatives,” continued the University of Michigan student.

Zhu, who was just old enough to vote in the 2016 Presidential election, also appeared in a YouTube video titled “Why this 18-year-old is voting for Donald Trump.”

Zhu is 100 percent correct. I should know; I’ve done both.

I agree with Zhu: Coming out as conservative is far harder than coming out as gay. I should know; I’ve done both.

I “came out” as gay after my wife and I divorced in the late 1990s. I was amazed at the acceptance I experienced. No one condemned me or my predilections.

My experience “coming out as a conservative” to other gays, lesbians, and my liberal neighbors and colleagues, on the other hand, was often exceedingly unpleasant.

As I began forming friendships with other gay men in the Washington, D.C. area, one thing quickly became very clear to me: I had better keep my political and social opinions to myself. Or else.

When I began dating a man who was related to a powerful Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives, he felt obligated to disclose the fact up front as if it might be a deal-breaker. I felt sorry for him: The look on his face was pained, as if he were confessing some unforgivable crime. He was astounded when I congratulated him and told him I thought his cousin was one of the best men in Congress.

Once when we were about to attend an event with his extended family, he warned me to keep my mouth shut about being a conservative because it would ruin everyone’s evening. He went so far as to assure me that one of his siblings who taught political science at a prestigious Washington, D.C. university would be so enraged he would storm out of the gathering in disgust.

Another time I was confronted by his sister-in-law who was clearly mortified that her husband’s brother was dating a conservative. And more than that, she demanded to know, “How can you be a conservative? You’re gay!”

I looked her in the eye and countered, “You’re an adult. You have children. How can you be a liberal?”

I would later tell that story as I traveled around the country testifying before state legislatures and others about the dangers of same-sex marriage:

There are lots of other examples, such as the time I went to a party where most everyone was a member of the Metropolitan Community Church, with its exclusively LGBT congregation. I was engaged in a long conversation about art and architecture with the ‘wife’ of the female minister who led the Church. Thirty minutes into our discussion, I mentioned I was a conservative and she just drifted away without saying a word, as if I were suddenly a pariah.

Another time I submitted an opinion piece to The Washington Post titled “Why I oppose same-sex marriage.” Before publishing my commentary, I had to speak with three different editors because none of them could fathom that anyone who is gay could disagree with the notion of “gay marriage.” I had to repeatedly assure them that I was indeed “gay.”

Within 24 hours of the article’s publication, a page was created on a gay website with my picture, excerpts from my writings, and more than 100 mostly vile comments posted, all meant to intimidate and prevent folks like me from speaking up.

One gay man in Italy found me on Facebook and sent me this note, saying I would be responsible for the suicides of gay youth:

If Maryland would approve the repeal ... i think that every suicide of a gay young in Maryland will be caused a little by your piece.

Others said, “Call him Little Roy Cohn;” “He's the gay equivalent of Uncle Tom;” “He's just another republican house faggot. Pay him no mind.”

Needless to say, over time I lost all of my gay friends.

Happy ending

This story has a happy ending. The backlash I experienced simply for being a conservative contributed to my being radicalized. Not only did I become an outspoken critic of same-sex marriage in the years leading up to the Supreme Court’s devestating Obergefell decision, I was moved to reject homosexuality and to live chastely.

Eventually, my wife and I put our marriage back together again. That was eight years ago. Not long after that, I returned to full communion with the Catholic Church.

Moral of the story: Conservatives are tolerant and possess human compassion; Liberals have no need for you if you disagree with them.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


UK investigating study used to justify giving puberty-blockers to 11-year-olds


UNITED KINGDOM, July 23, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — When the British National Health Service (NHS) decided that hormone-blocking drugs may be dispensensed to gender-confused children as young as eleven, it did so partly on the basis of a study that’s now being investigated for poor methodology and omitted data.


Puberty-blockers are the first precursor to so-called sex reassignment surgery. They prevent puberty’s changes to a teen’s body from taking root and can permanently weaken bones. At age sixteen, patients are then given “cross-sex” hormones to develop traits resembling the opposite of their sex, such as testosterone developing muscle and body hair in girls and estrogen helping boys develop breast tissue.

Critics argue that there are numerous health risks surrounding the physical and psychological reinforcement of gender confusion

The Tavistock Clinic, run by the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), offers young “transgender” patients puberty-blockers. Until 2011, a child had to be at least sixteen to qualify, but that year, researchers from GIDS and University College Hospitals began a study into the drugs’ “psychological, social and physical effects,” which led to the age being lowered to eleven, the BBC reports.

“All patients were seen regularly by mental health professionals,” GIDS claims. “They concluded that there was no evidence of harms that could be directly attributed to the treatment and that continuation of the study was appropriate."

However, an investigation by the BBC program Newsnight uncovered evidence of key information that was withheld from the participants’ parents and from health officials, as well as of problems with the study’s methodology.

Clear cause-effect relationships cannot be reliably determined due to the study’s small sample size of 44 kids and lack a control group against which to compare the results, according to the report. More concerning, neither the participating children nor their parents were told that “transitions” normally follow up the puberty-blockers with cross-sex hormones.

“I don’t see that the parents and their children could really have given informed consent given the lack of information that was provided,” Oxford sociology professor Michael Biggs said. “They were not given the information they needed in order to take this momentous life-changing step.”

Most alarmingly, follow-up data showed a “significant increase” of kids in the study answering that they “deliberately try to hurt or kill myself” after being on the blockers for a year.

Prof. Susan Bewley, who chairs Healthwatch, a charity for science and integrity in health care, is one of a number of doctors raising concerns about the lack of evidence in this area of medicine.

That change “is very worrying,” Bewley said. “Good medical practice would normally be very reflective about an increase in harms.” Yet these findings weren’t passed along to the Health Research Authority (HRA).

“The information that Newsnight has brought to our attention has not been raised with us before,” HRA chief executive Teresa Allen said in response to Newsnight’s revelations. “We will therefore investigate further, which may include a review of the original ethics opinion.” NHS England claims its policies on hormone-blockers “was based on international evidence and developed with clinical experts and publicly consulted on,” as well as an evaluation of the 2011 study (a copy of which the BBC says NHS has failed to provide). Nevertheless, in light of the new revelations, “the specification will be reviewed.”

In April, five former clinic workers resigned from Tavistock in protest, accusing GIDS of carrying out “life-changing medical intervention” for children and teens “without sufficient evidence of its long-term effects” and sometimes without even diagnosing a cause for their confusion or establishing that they truly suffered from gender dysphoria.

Last year, the NHS came under fire for administering puberty-blockers to as many as 150 children who were incorrectly diagnosed with gender dysphoria when they may have instead been autistic.

The BBC notes that the latest scandal comes as GIDS is facing scrutiny for how it presents puberty-blockers’ long-term implications to gender-confused children and how it treats dissent from gender orthodoxy.

“GIDS clinicians tell children and families that puberty blockers/hormone blocks are ‘fully reversible’ but the reality is no one knows what the impacts are on children’s brains so how is it possible to make this claim?” Dr. Kirsty Entwistle, former GIDS clinician, wrote in an open letter last week. “It is also a problem that GIDS clinicians are afraid of raising their concerns for fear of being labelled transphobic by colleagues.”






By The Hermits, Jul 19 2019 09:27AM

All I can say is: can the rest of the world please pray for Britain. We are now living in the world of the 'post-apocalyptic' film genre. We have a dictatorship controlling the UK and it isn't the Prime Minister, the Queen, or even Parliament (although it is acting as the Dictator's agents as were the Law Courts in the cases of Charlie Gard and Alfie Evans). It is the Forces of Evil, embodied as the anti-life zeitgeist of the 'liberal' agenda. Satan is the de-facto ruler of Britain, and what a price we will have to pay when God eventually steps in to purify or destroy this nation.



BREAKING: UK Parliament votes to impose abortion on Northern Ireland


July 18, 2019 (SPUC) – Today, Members of UK Parliament (MPs) have voted to disrespect Northern Ireland’s delicate devolution settlement by imposing abortion upon the region and people of Northern Ireland. The vote, which took place in the House of Commons this afternoon, saw MP’s scandalously support the Northern Ireland Executive Formation Bill, which would see unborn children stripped of protections by 328 to 65 votes – a majority of 263.

What Next?

The Bill will see the repeal of section 58 and section 59 of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act which are currently the only safeguards protecting unborn children from the threat of abortion in Northern Ireland. As well as imposing abortion on Northern Ireland, pro-abortion MPs are making clear their intention to ensure England and Wales are also facing abortion decriminalisation. Diana Johnson commented to this effect during the short parliamentary debate this afternoon. Unless the Northern Ireland Assembly reconvenes, abortion will be imposed upon the region by the 21st of October 2019.

Michael Robinson, Director of Parliamentary Communications for SPUC, said: “The UK has one of the most extreme abortion regimes in the world. Since 1967, our laws have permitted the killing of more than 9 million babies and injured countless women physically and psychologically. The Abortion Act has brought only misery and destruction. No society which is genuinely committed to equality and human rights could tolerate such a law. We are now faced with the prospect of an even more extreme situation being imposed on Northern Ireland. The people of Scotland, England and Wales cannot simply stand by and watch as this cruel and unjust legislation is enacted in their name.

Mr Robinson added: “Upon leaving office next week, Theresa May will only be remembered as the Prime Minister who undermined devolution in Northern Ireland and ushered in one of the most ruthless abortion regimes in the world. Anyone who values human life must urge the new Prime Minister to refuse to implement this inhuman and unconstitutional law.”

A Disgraceful Abuse Of Power

Liam Gibson, SPUC’s Northern Ireland Political Officer said: “What has happened today is a disgraceful abuse of power by Westminster. It is outrageous that MPs and peers from England, Scotland and Wales cared so little for the rule of law that an overwhelming majority were prepared to disregard the right of the people of Northern Ireland to maintain legislation which has saved the lives of over 100,000 children since 1967.

“The speed with which this Bill has been imposed has made a mockery of the parliamentary process. There is a complete lack of clarity regarding its provisions and the government has refused to allow time for any proper consideration of the consequences of the decriminalisation of abortion.

“By ramming abortion on demand down our throats Parliament has torn-up the devolution settlement and is treating Northern Ireland as a colony.

There are very serious questions about the constitutionality of this legislation which the next Prime Minister will have to answer.

Mr Gibson added: “What is most shocking is that all this has been done in the name of human rights. Abortion is not a human right. It is an act of lethal violence directed at an unborn child and is never justified.”


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Italian hospital offers help to 5-year-old girl who UK doctors want to unplug from life support


GENOA, Italy, July 18, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – An Italian hospital has offered to treat a little girl who suffered a sudden stroke and is now fighting for her life against doctors who have taken legal steps to remove her from life support and let her die.

According to Italian news site Genova 24, the Giannina Gaslini Institute, a world-renowned children’s hospital in Genoa, has confirmed that it received a request at the end of June from the parents of five-year-old Tafida Raqueeb for a “second opinion” regarding her condition.

Tafida suffered a ruptured blood vessel in February 2019, and is now lying in Royal London Hospital in a minimally conscious state. Although her parents Shalina and Mohammed believe that her condition is improving, Tafida’s doctors have gone to court for permission to remove the girl from a ventilator, which they believe will hasten her death.

Genova 24 reported that in response to Tafida’s parents’ request, the Gaslini Institute has organized a team of specialists to treat the girl. The team sent a document to Tafida’s London doctors, and subsequently had a video-conference with them.

Tafida’s parents hope to transport their daughter to the Italian hospital at their own expense. The local news site added that treatment of patients does not end in Italy until the patient is “brain dead.”

Italian media are comparing the case of five-year-old Tafida to those of Charlie Gard, who died in 2017 at the age of 11 months, 24 days, and Alfie Evans, who died in 2018 eleven days before his second birthday. Charlie had been diagnosed with Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome and Alfie with GABA-transaminase deficiency. Both boys were treated by doctors who went to court for permission to bring about their deaths by removing their ventilators, and both had parents who wished to transfer them for experimental treatment in foreign hospitals.

In the Charlie Gard case, both New York-Presbyterian Hospital and the Vatican-owned Bambino Gesù hospital in Rome were willing to treat the sick child. The Bambino Gesù was similarly willing to treat Alfie Evans, whose father attempted, and failed, to remove him from Liverpool’s Alder Hey hospital to a waiting helicopter. However, in both cases British judges ruled in favor of the hospitals, and the boys died after being removed from life support. Charlie died the next day; Alfie hung on, breathing on his own, for five days.

Both cases attracted an enormous following in Italy, Poland, and the United States where there was a great outpouring of sympathy for the children and their parents and criticism of the English hospitals involved and the British justice system.





By The Hermits, Jun 22 2019 10:54AM

Nazi Germany did forced abortions, Japan used to do forced abortions but has now apologised, China still does forced abortions, Britian is now about to do a forced abortion!


Also, this atrocity is about to happen to a Cathoic family in the Arch-diocese of Westminster. So, Cardinal Vincent Nichols, have you spoken out yet? You are responsible for the safety of your flock, therefore protect them! Only yesterday you were strongly criticized for focusing "too much on the reputation of the church during his tenure, rather than the welfare of children and the impacts of child sexual abuse on victims and survivors,” the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse (IICSA) said. “Children could have been saved from abuse if the church had not been so determined to protect its own reputation above all else.” So now try to at least save one vulnerable adult and her child from the extreme abuse of a forced abortion and death by dismemberment or other means. You did not fight the State imposed deaths of Charlie Gard or Alfie Evans for their "crime" of refusing to die when the medical authorities said they should. You were even involved in removing the priest who was the spiritual support for the distressed parents of Alfie. You are getting old, soon you will be at the Judgement Seat. Do you want to be presented with your own mill-wheel and be sent to drown in hell, or will you do something to prevent it? It is not too late to repent and turn back to God, away from the State endorsed carnival of LGBT gayity and depravity to the sober and moral Laws of God.


Anyone who is in England who reads this, please spread the news, please do what you can to encourage others to also make their views known. A grandmother, mother, and child depend on all of us. And may God Himself act on the reason and mind of the Judge, so that she does not blindly follow the warped logic of the pro-abortion medical lobby, but think instead on the right to life of the three people involved.


The article below is taken from LifeSiteNews who obtained it from SPUC:


June 21, 2019 (SPUC) -- “This is an outrage which should shock every right-thinking person."


In a horrific abuse of power by the medical profession, an NHS trust is asking a judge to allow them to perform an abortion on a mentally-ill woman who is 22 weeks' pregnant – despite her mother saying she will care for the child.


Mrs. Justice Lieven began analysing the evidence yesterday in the Court of Protection at the Royal Courts of Justice complex in London. She ruled that the woman, who lives in the London area, cannot be named, and nor can the NHS Trust bringing the application.


In her 'best interests'


Fiona Paterson, the barrister for the trust, said that doctors caring for the woman, who is in her 20s and diagnosed with a "moderately severe" learning disorder and a mood disorder, believe an abortion is in her best interests.


“(Her) treating clinicians consider that on balance, a termination is in her best interests,” she said in a written case outline.


“In broad terms, (they) believe that as a result of her learning disabilities, (she) would find labour very difficult to tolerate and the recovery from a Caesarean section very challenging.


“(They) consider that (she) is likely to find the loss of a pregnancy easier to recover from than separation from the baby if he or she is taken into care.


“They also consider that (she) is at increased risk of psychosis if the pregnancy continues.”


Ignoring her wishes and feelings


The woman’s mother, who is a member of the Nigerian Igbo community, is fighting the application. She says abortion is against her Roman Catholic religious beliefs and her cultural beliefs. She also said that she would be able to care for the baby, and that her daughter’s abilities and wishes were being undermined.


Barrister John McKendrick QC, who is leading the woman’s mother’s legal team, told the judge: “It is accepted that (the woman) lacks capacity to conduct these proceedings and to make a decision in respect of whether or not to consent to a termination and associated ancillary treatment.


“That being said, (her mother) considers that the applicant has underestimated (her) ability and understanding, and that more weight should be place on her wishes and feelings.”


Mr McKendrick said, “Termination is not in (the woman’s) best interests.”


He also said that the judge had “no proper evidence” to show that allowing the pregnancy to continue would put the woman’s life or long-term health at grave risk.


“The applicants have failed to carry out a proper best interests analysis,” he said. “Their evidence is premised on a narrow clinical view. The application must be dismissed.”


The woman herself is independently represented by staff from the office of the Official Solicitor, who help mentally-ill people at the centre of litigation. Susanna Rickard, the barrister who is leading the woman’s legal team, also said abortion did not appear to be in her best interests.


Cruelty and barbarity


SPUC’s deputy chief executive John Deighan said:


“This is an outrage which should shock every right-thinking person. It is a level of cruelty and barbarity reminiscent of how people with mental health issues were treated in the 1930s of Nazi Germany. To force abortion on any person is abhorrent and to do so in the name of medicine and in the complete defiance of the religious and cultural values of the mother concerned calls into question the structures of law and justice in our society.”


Reprinted with permission from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.


By The Hermits, Jun 13 2017 11:03AM

Everything looks pretty disastrous. Rumours, half-truths, and lies abound. We hear that Cardinal Muller was forced to sack three members of the CDF on orders from Pope Francis. We hear that Pope Francis has instigated a secret commission to possibly reverse Humanae Vitae. We are told that the C9, those Cardinals were appointed to clean up the Vatican Finances and reform the Curia, have really failed to get anything done of a really reforming nature. It seems that the Jesuits have all but drifted off into heresy, especially when the Jesuit General, Father Arturo Sosa Abascal, says that the Devil is only symbolic, not real, and when there is a storm of protest, a representative of the General rather blandly says that the General holds everything that the Catholic Church believes in. Archbishop Paglia has been trying to explain why he had the homoerotic and utterly blasphemous fresco done in his Cathedral when he was Bishop of Terni, and the excuse is so lame as to not be worth reporting. The latest rumour is that the Heralds of The Gospel are going to have an Apostolic Visitation, which does not bode well for their future. To make things even more bizarre, The Pope has very recently said that God cannot be God without Man! To cap all this lunacy with utter silliness, Pope Francis has decided that all the Cardinals resident in Rome must tell him, when they are away. He is every inch the martinet headmaster without any of the wisdom.

The rubbish that emanates from Rome now, and the disappearance of truth and plain speaking, the ambiguities, and double dealing remind me of the lines from Matilda, that great cautionary tale and poem by Hilaire Belloc.

Matilda told such Dreadful lies

It made one Gasp and stretch one’s eyes.

Matilda having called the London Fire Brigade, when of course there was no fire, to say her aunt’s house was burning down, resulted in the house being deluged with water and all Mathilda’s aunts’ paintings were all ruined. A few weeks later when Matilda’s aunt had gone to the theatre to see “The Second Mrs Tanqueray”, and left Matilda at home as a punishment for lying, the house indeed burns down. Poor Matilda screams for help, but none comes:

For every time She shouted ‘Fire!’

They only answered ‘Little Liar’

And therefore when her Aunt returned,

Matilda and the House, were Burned

In some mysterious way, I believe that is what is happening to the Church. Fr.Linus Clovis recently delivered a superb talk at The Family Life International Conference in Rome, where he quoted John Paul II’s prophecy of a time when you would have an Anti-Church and the Church. What comes vividly to my mind is the film “The Alien” where the Alien has been embedded inside the character that John Hurt plays and bursts out from his chest, thereby killing him, but now able to wreak horror everywhere. There is an alien creature within the Church, which is made up of high ranking clergy and religious, and the deplorable lay liberal Catholic intelligentsia, who pride themselves on being modern and avantgarde and worst of all friends with the World. That World which, St. John the Evangelist warns us against, is the Devil’s domain. I have that chilling vision of these clerics being like the priests that Ezekiel sees in chapter 8 of his marvellously prophetic book:


So he brought me to the porches of the court (of the Temple). Then He said to me, “Son of man, dig a hole.” So I dug, and behold, a door. He said to me. “Go in, and see the lawless deeds they are doing here.” So I went in, and behold, I saw vain abominations --- all the idols of the house of Israel were portrayed on the wall around. There were seventy men of the elders of the house of Israel, and in their midst was Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan. Each man had a censer in his hand, and the smoke of the incense rose up. Then He said to me, “Son of Man”, do you see what the elders of the house of Israel are doing, each one of them in their private bedroom? For they said, ‘The Lord does not see; the Lord has forsaken the land.’” (Ezekiel 8: 7-12)

It seems that such things are going on in the Church today, and more terrible than these. The Bishop of the Diocese of Hallam in England has been encouraging people to offer flowers and gifts when visiting pagan shrines, and kissing pagan holy books, and one wonders how this bishop, a son of St. Alphonsus Ligouri, can encourage such spiritual wrecklessness, nay devotion to Pagan gods, something utterly forbidden to the early Christians, and something in Tertullian’s mind that was beyond forgiveness? How have we ended up in this nightmare world of blasphemy and lies? The answer lies in that disastrous and ambiguous document Nostra Aetate. There is no dialogue with non-Christian religions. There is of course dialogue with Judaism as the Jews are the firstborn, the Olive tree planted by God, it is the Old Israel, and we the Church, the New Israel share the Old Testament with the Jews. Islam, as St. John Damascene said, is only a Christian heresy. So there is only room for only a very limited dialogue. It is also demonically inspired, as it is a caricature of Christianity and Judaism.


That the Modern Church has completely forgotten or chosen to ignore all those great saints and Popes who warned against the evils of Islam is truly staggering, but Moslems, like the Anglo-Saxons in 5th century Britain, will soon take over Europe, as the Anglo-Saxons took over England. If the true Faith, so long derided or compromised by leading Church leaders, does not revive then our religious leaders will see much of the Church destroyed and countless souls lost and it will be their doing. They, like the people of Jerusalem seen in Ezekiel’s vision, will be cut down by the Man “clothed with a full length robe, with a belt of sapphire about his waist” (Ezekiel 9: 2) who is ordered by God, to go through the city and mark the just with the mark of the Tau, while the others, not marked with the Tau, are handed over to destruction at the hands of his companions. Pope Innocent III, in his opening sermon at the Fourth Lateran Council saw himself as the man in white, but the Orthodox Study Bible rightly sees the Man in White as prefiguring Christ.

The Church, the New Jerusalem, will be handed over to be punished with fire and sword. Her leaders at present are betraying Christ, with regard to his teaching on marriage, morals, the Devil, Hell and Heaven. The men who surround the Pope, and who advise him, and flatter him, remind me of the appalling associates of Joseph Stalin, so brilliantly portrayed in Simon Sebag-Montefiore’s magnificent book “At the Court of the Red Tsar”. Those who have said they would correct the Pope have, seemingly failed to do so. They do not have to do anything particularly remarkable, they simply have to present the Pope with the words of Christ, and the Sixth Commandment, “Thou shalt not commit adultery”. Nothing could be simpler. Christ talked of Hell and the Devil many times. Either one believes in the Bible or one does not. You cannot have it both ways as the present status quo would have it.

Soon we will see terrors and chaos beyond our wildest imaginings. We will see the seeming destruction of the Church. We must be brave, and be filled with hope. Walking in the steps of the great martyrs, and confessors of the Early Church we must, with palms in our hands, go through the fires of persecution for the sake of truth and, with love high in our hearts, we must welcome the Cross even to martyrdom. Christ did not call us to comfort and an easy life. Why? Because He did not have a comfortable and easy life himself, and why should we? If we claim to be his followers, then we should be like his disciples, and the Apostles sharing in Christ’s life. Are we so blind as to not see the joy and the romance of the truly Christian life? Do we not see that it requires everything? We may not be called to be like St. Paul, St. Athanasius, St. Catherine of Siena, St.Vincent Ferrer, The English and Welsh Martyrs, but we are called to great holiness by being obedient to the Gospel, and to be true friends of Christ suffering all that he suffered in his life. If we want to know how to behave then all we have to do is to live the life proposed by Christ to us in the Sermon on the Mount, whose two wings are the Ten Commandments, and the great parable of the Last Judgement. It is as simple as that.

However, we will look upon a Rome burning once again, and a Church apparently destroyed by those within, and by enemies without, but we must not fear because the Church is not the Pope’s, nor does it belong to Cardinals, Bishops, and priests, neither is it the domain of religious, and it does not belong to this shibboleth, “The People”, a notion that always sounds redolent of a Marxist viewpoint. The Church belongs to Christ. She is his bride, who at present looks like a Harlot, but Christ will clothe her again in his righteousness, his beauty, his glory, and his holiness. We should not be afraid, and how could we? For he so often sends his own Mother, Our Lady of Victories, to console us, and encourage us, and lead us in the great army that will, along with the great Heavenly Host, finally defeat Satan, his cohorts of devils, and all those who rebel against Christ and who will not serve him, and refuse to love him.

It is as simple as that. The West is passing away, and what will take its place we do not know. All we do know is that the World will be visited with such disasters that it will look a very different place, as different as the world looked before and after the Flood. We must not fear, but simply cast ourselves upon the Divine Mercy and trust with all our might and main.

Christ has won the victory, but we must do our part. We are not asked to be passive, but throw ourselves into the fray with all the ardour of love as true Crusaders of Christ determined his Honour, his Truth, and this Law.




By The Hermits, May 14 2017 10:03AM

It must surely be one of Our Lady’s most delightful gestures, and fragrant with all that is truly motherly and comforting; that the miracle that has been recognized as authentic and necessary for the canonization of Francisco and Jacinta Marto should be the healing of a 5 year old Brazilian boy called Lucas, who fell 20 feet from an upstairs window with terrible brain injuries.

Jacinta always stressed the great need of purity, and Francisco spent his time praying the rosary that he might comfort the suffering Christ. Together with their cousin and great friend Lucia, stand not simply as visionaries but as prophets to a century in which bloodshed, cruelty, sexual immorality, and scientific perversion have all but drowned humanity in a sea of Satanic degeneracy.

The Woman clothed in the Sun came to these peasant children to ask them to pray for the conversion of Russia, to warn them and the Church and the World that the sin that casts most people into Hell is the sin of impurity, and that if the World did not repent then there would be a Second World War. Despite the continual and at times acrimonious controversy as to whether John Paul consecrated Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Our Lady of Fatima said that finally her Immaculate Heart would triumph and the World would be given a period of peace, which no doubt will end with the coming of the Antichrist. There is, to my mind, little doubt that the great miracle of the Sun at Fatima is what we see described in chapter 12 of the Apocalypse.

What is so wonderful about Jacinta and Francisco is that there is a quality of martyrdom. Both fell victim to the terrible Spanish flu that raged through Europe and the United States in the aftermath of World War I. Both children knew they were to die, and at least Francisco died at home, whereas poor Jacinta was moved from hospital to hospital, but to no avail and Jacinta dies alone in a hospital in Lisbon.

In a Church where many are obsessed with sex, the question is being discussed by the highest ecclesiastical dignitaries as to whether people who are having sex sinfully can receive communion. Whereas these children stand as rock like witnesses to the truth that impurity damns, and that our highest obligation is to love God with every fibre of our being, and that the road to heaven is not one of ease and comfort, but is the way of the Cross.

Francisco by nature was somewhat lazy, liked playing his flute and liked being on his own. Jacinta had a sweet singing voice and a talent for dancing; being the youngest of the family she was understandably spoilt. They were very normal children. It is to my mind amazing that Pius XI felt that these two children could not be canonized during his time, as they did not understand what heroic virtue entailed. I quote from Wikipedia this illuminating extract.


“In 1937 Pope Pius XI decided that causes for minors should not be accepted as they could not fully understand heroic virtue or practice it repeatedly, both of which are essential for canonization. For the next four decades, no sainthood processes for children were pursued. In 1979 the bishop of Leiria-Fatima asked all the world's bishops to write to the Pope, petitioning him to make an exception for Francisco, who had died at age 10, and Jacinta, who had died at age 9. More than 300 bishops sent letters to the Pope, writing that “the children were known, admired and attracted people to the way of sanctity. Favors were received through their intercession.” The bishops also said that the children's canonization was a pastoral necessity for the children and teenagers of the day.

In 1979 the Congregation for the Causes of Saints convened a general assembly. Cardinals, bishops, theologians and other experts debated whether it was possible for children to display heroic virtue. Eventually, they decided that, like the very few children who have a genius for music or mathematics, "in some supernatural way, some children could be spiritual prodigies." They (Jacinta and Francisco) were declared venerable by Pope John Paul II in 1989.”

Two things spring to mind. When the three children are abducted by the authorities, they are interrogated and threatened to boiled alive if they do not retract their testimony that Our Lady has appeared to them. The children, believing that their final hour has come, refuse to recant. This is heroism to the point of martyrdom. Then 42 years later there is a meeting of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints to discuss the possibility of the two children becoming saints and they equate Francisco and Jacinta with child prodigies. What has an intellectual or artistic talent in the very young got to do with heroic sanctity; surely it is about co-operation with grace. Did Pius XI read the accounts of their lives? Did he not know, and did not the Congregation for the Causes of Saints know what anyone brought up on the Penny Catechism knows, namely that a child can commit a mortal sin at the age of reason, which is about the age of seven or thereabouts. Heaven help us when such a fine Pope as Pius XI can miss the point, and that the Congregation can come out with such nonsense. How far we are from the Gospel, which is so simple and whose fishermen apostles have so much in common with these little shepherds, who knew nothing of luxury and comfort, but who intuitively knew the language of Heaven, the power of prayer, and the salvific quality penance. How the Church needs them today. The Christian LGBT and sadly the Catholic LGBT along with their Cardinal, bishop, priest, and religious supporters should hang their heads in shame, and so too should the divorced and remarried Catholics wanting to receive communion. They are not worthy to hold a candle to these wonderful children.


What then do these two wonderful children have to teach us? In a word utter simplicity. Their lives were lived amid the cycle of the seasons for they were from farming stock. They had the liturgical life of the Church to guide them through the Church’s year and there was the joy of the big festivals like Christmas, Epiphany, Easter, The Ascension, Pentecost, and the great feasts of Our Lady. Heaven was close to them as was the liturgical cycle and occasionally these met when the Angel of Portugal gave them communion.

So let us hope that Saints Francisco and Jacinta will today bring to the Pope a great grace whereby he can fully understand, what so many Catholics have forgotten; that purity and chastity are fundamental virtues that are absolutely necessary if we wish to enter Heaven. This purity is not simply about virginity and chastity. It is about purity of heart. It is about the sixth beatitude.

Blessed are the pure in heart,

For they shall see God


It is interesting to note that the first beatitude, and the last are about inheriting the Kingdom of Heaven, but the sixth is about seeing God. Francisco, and Jacinta and their cousin Lucia, the main seer, and who was destined to outlive her cousins by 84 years, saw Christ, saw his Mother, saw St Joseph and saw the angels; because they were innocent, and were brought up to be natural and unaffectedly pious and devout, because they were taught the simple truths of their faith, and taught what was right, and what was wrong. God sent his Mother to write on the tablets of their hearts what men and women must do to be reconciled to God. What was at the heart of Our Lady’s message? That we repent, that we consecrate ourselves to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and that Russia be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary as well. Our Lady’s Heart is Immaculate and Pure. Of all of the human race, with the exception of her Son, who after all was God, Mary was utterly pure of heart, and perfectly humble, the utter personification of being “poor in spirit”.

Francisco and Jacinta and their cousin Lucia are not only spiritually allied to the Anawim, “The Quiet in the Land” as the simple humble and devout Israelites were described, but they are also prophets like Elijah, like Isaiah, like Ezekiel. They call us to repentance, and call us by their lives to be people of simplicity and peace, who obey God’s commandments not out of fear but out of love; love for God, and love for Our Lady. If we wish for a world of goodness, love and peace then let us live our lives with the simplicity and whole heartedness of this radiantly good, and utterly natural brother and sister, who died out of love for God and for the salvation of sinners,



By The Hermits, Apr 30 2017 04:36PM

Malcolm Muggeridge, in his book entitled “Jesus Rediscovered” is seen very much as a prophet for our present times. When he was writing these articles in the 60’s, and giving the interview to Roy Trevivian, you see the conversion of a notorious womanizer, and drunk, albeit one who was a brilliant journalist and T.V. interviewer, into a profound, if somewhat unorthodox Christian. He was able as something of an outsider to view the Church very accurately. Here are two excerpts from his Chapter “Am I a Christian?”

One may marvel, that when pretty well every item of Christian belief and Christian ethics has been thus subjected to some degree of denigration and attack by those ostensibly responsible for upholding and propagating them, congregations of sorts none the less continue to assemble in parish churches on Sunday mornings, and ordinands and novices, though in dwindling numbers, continue to come forward with seemingly authentic vocations. The Church of Christ has to stagger on under the guidance of those who increasingly sympathise with, when they do not actually countenance, every attack on its doctrines, integrity and traditional practices. By one of our time’s larger ironies, ecumenicalism is triumphant just when there is nothing to be ecumenical about; the various religious bodies are likely to find it easy to join together only because, believing little, they correspondingly differ about little. I look forward to the day when an Anglican bishop in full canonicals will attend a humanist rally on the South Downs, or a Salvation Army band lead a procession of Young Atheists to lay a wreath on Karl Marx’ grave in Highgate Cemetery. It cannot be long delayed if it has not happened already. (Jesus Rediscovered, p. 38).

Far worse has of course happened with gay weddings being acceptable in the Church of Scotland. Such a volte face is unbelievable, but for the fact of the very remoteness of Calvin’s God, and his terrifying theory of Double Predestination. If you are predestined to Hell you might as well enjoy yourself now, and as your Church says that from all eternity some are destined to Hell, then the ministers of that dour Church should happily tie the knot, for there is nothing you can do about it. Then there is the spectacle of the Archbishop of Canterbury lamenting that he cannot do a gay wedding. On a sadder note we remember St. John Paul II being manipulated into the inter religions meeting in Assisi in 1986, which his predecessors prior to Paul VI would have been appalled at. An English Bishop in full canonicals attending a humanist rally is somewhat put into the shade after the Assisi episode.

The second excerpt from “Jesus Rediscovered” then develops the theme of the Church on a path to auto-destruction.

The surrender of institutional Christianity to the promoters of a kingdom of heaven on earth has been so abject, the assumptions of scientific materialism so widely accepted and arrogantly stated, that an aspiring Christian today is left in a kind of catacomb of his own making, utterly remote from the debates and discussions going on around him, whether about “permissive” morality (divorce, contraception and abortion ----- those three panaceas for all matrimonial ills), or about the basic dogma of Christian faith.

In my copy of the New Testament I underline passages which take my fancy. Nearly all of them are about the deceitfulness of this world and of riches, about how concupiscence and vanity separate us from God, and about glorying in tribulation which brings patience, experience and hope, about the flesh lusting against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh, these being contrary to one another so that we cannot do the things that we would do, and so on. It is difficult to think of any sentiments which would be more intrinsically unsympathetic in most clerical circles. They, are I should say, about the most unpopular sentences it is possible to utter today; at religious gatherings they cause malaise and irritation; on radio and television panels derision and incredulity. When I use them I am often accused of insincerity and affectation, so rooted are the opposite assumptions --- that by caring about this world we shall all make it better, that we must aim collectively to get richer in order to get happier and happier, that the unrestrained satisfaction of earthly hopes and desires is the way to physical, mental and spiritual contentment.


However, I love these sentences, and often say them over to myself. I should like them to govern my every thought and activity for the rest of my life. They seem to me to be true, and the notion of making the world better by caring about it, and achieving happiness through material prosperity and sensual pleasure, quite nonsensical. In face of the otherworldliness which I still unfashionably find in the Gospels, as far I am concerned the whole edifice of twentieth-century materialism --- and utopian hopes that go therewith ---- falls flat on its face. One is delivered from the myth of progress. The terrible vision of a Scandinavian-American paradise, with longer lives, more and better aphrodisiacs and more leisure and amenities for all, dissolves into a nightmare, awaking from which one advances gingerly upon the sublime truth that to live it is necessary to die, that a life can only be kept by being lost--- propositions which strike contemporary minds as pessimistic, but which seem to me optimistic to the point of insanity, implying as they do, that it is possible for mere man, with his brief life and stunted vision, to aspire after universal understanding and a universal love. Is this being a Christian? Ask me another. (pp.39-40)

Quite what Muggeridge would make of Pope Francis would be hard to imagine, for the present Pope, whose heretical utterances and endorsement of such scandalous people as Emma Bonino, Paul Erlich, and George Soros, who are undoubted enemies of both Christ and the Church, would perhaps be made clearer when we remember that Muggeridge thought that “Good Pope John” was the most disastrous Pope in History. What must be stressed however is the utterly erroneous perception of the World that far too many ecclesiastics, great and small have had since the 60’s. The love affair with the world is sadly damnable and condemned by St. John; “Love not the world, nor the things which are in the world. If any man love the world, the charity of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, is the concupiscence of the flesh, and the concupiscence of the eyes, and the pride of life, which is not of the Father, but is of the world.” (1 John; ch.2 vv. 15-16) and then we have the Pope and goodness knows what other deluded ecclesiastic worried that the planet is in danger because of Global Warming, which has not been scientifically proved. We pause and wonder at such stupidity. Why we must ask ourselves are people so concerned with over population, which is another myth, and even if it wasn’t (There is no overpopulation in Western Europe, and there is definitely underpopulation in Russia), it is a strange way of looking at things. It is a lack of trust in God. It is his creation, and not ours; we are only stewards and pretty incompetent ones at that. The Pope’s real problem is the political and ideological atmosphere that he has been reared in.

Unless I have completely misunderstood Pope Francis’ parents’ decision to emigrate to Argentina in the 30’s, it was because they could not stand the thought of remaining in Mussolini’s fascist Italy. Unfortunately it was out of the frying pan into the fire. Juan Peron was a great admirer of Mussolini, and wanted to reproduce something similar in Argentina. He might have managed it, if his glamorous second wife Evan Peron had not died prematurely. The entry for Peron in the 2002 Chambers Biographical Dictionary is illuminating and very helpful:


Juan Peron was born in Lobos, in the province of Southern Buenos Aires. He joined the army in 1913, and took a leading part in the army revolt in 1943 which toppled the pro-Axis President, Ramon Castillo. He was well read, a hypnotic speaker and a close student of Benito Mussolini; he developed a broad base of popular support, augmenting his rule with force.

He used his position as Secretary of Labour to gain union support, while using his other position as Under-Secretary of War to cultivate junior officers. He organized the descamisados, a civilian paramilitary organization which, like Hitler’s Brownshirts and Mussolini’s Blackshirts, was drawn from the lower classes. Their affections were secured by his politically astute wife, Eva Peron, and when she died in 1952 they greatly mourned her. In 1945, senior army and naval officers, alarmed at Peron’s mobilization of the masses, imprisoned Peron, but released him after thousands gathered in the public squares demanding his return.

In 1946 after a populist campaign laced with strong nationalist and anti-American rhetoric, ‘El Lider’ was elected President and set about building a corporatist state. He reduced the legislature and the judiciary to rubber-stamps, tried to crush all opposition by any means including torture, and sought to modernize and industrialize the economy through large-scale government intervention and by nationalizing foreign-owned enterprises (including railways). In 1955 with the government in a shambles and having alienated the church, the military, the middle-class and some of the labour movement, he was deposed by the army and fled to Spain.

Peron did return in the last two years of his life, and when he died in 1974 his third wife Isabelita Peron was briefly President until she was toppled by the Military Coup of the Generals.

Pope Francis’ rule has all the hall marks of Peron’s method of ruling. Both are populists who wish to be popular with the masses. Pope Francis behaves as if the Papacy is his own. He allows a plate dinner to take place in the Sistine Chapel. He demotes those with whom he disagrees, namely Cardinal Burke, and refuses to give them audiences. He endorses PICO (People Improving Communities through organizing ---- anything more communist sounding would be hard to imagine) a leftist group with ties to George Soros, a Globalist who among other things is Anti-Christian and who helps destabilize regimes, such as the Ukraine in 2014. George Soros with the aid of Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga, the epitome of a left wing prelate and saturated with the ideology of Liberation Theology, pressured the Pope in his 2015 U.S. visit not to mention abortion, but emphasize economics and racial justice. The Pope’s treatment of the Friars of the Immaculate, and his treatment of Fra Matthew Festing, the former Grand Master of The Knights of Malta is an offence against International Law, as the Knights of Malta constitute a Sovereign State, and is also deeply uncharitable. His support of Emma Bonino and Paul Erlich who are open enemies of the Catholic Church and of Christ leave one speechless. A Pope, who says such things as, God would not send people to Hell, atheists can go to Heaven, who denies the miracles of the loaves fishes, and says Christ on the Cross becomes the devil like the Bronze servant has now crossed the Rubicon and become an Antipope?

The problem with the Left wing agenda is that, true to its Marxist ideology, it sees people as simply the masses, never is the encounter with a human being, a person made in the image of God. That is why both Hitler and Stalin, not to mention Mao and Pol Pot, saw people as the masses. When one views Hitler and Stalin’s huge armies on film, you are overwhelmed by the gigantic and monumental. Soviet art, and Nazi art hangs between the tasteless and the gargantuan. There is nothing intimate about these Nazis and the Soviets. One is overwhelmed by Speer’s model of Germania, the new Capital of the Third Reich, a model of the grotesque, the grand and the utterly superficial, and one is bemused by Stalin’s Moscow University. Both men were monsters, and produced the monstrous. Both turned on their own people in different ways. Both wielded power arbitrarily. Pope Francis should heed what happens when one does such a thing. He need look no further than one of his patron’s, namely St. Francis of Assisi.

In, what I consider the finest of the modern biographies of St. Francis, namely Omer Englebert’s biography, which I have recently been re-reading, I came across a footnote by the Franciscan, Father Hilarin Felder. It deals with the mistaken notion that St. Francis was a conscious social reformer, especially with regard to the founding of The Third Order, the order of Franciscan Tertiaries. What made the tertiaries so extraordinary is that they were not to carry weapons, and should not take oaths. At one stroke the whole feudal system was challenged. However let us read Father Hilarin’s comment.

That St. Francis was a social reformer such as, since Jesus Christ, the world had not seen, is generally admitted to-day. There is no doubt much truth in this and other similar views, but it should be said that neither in his writings nor in his discourse was St. Francis preoccupied with social and political needs. Like Christ he seemed indifferent to the temporal fate of parties and groups. It was the individual alone and his salvation that counted in his eyes. Certainly he preached the love of one’s neighbour, peace and interior happiness, the right of each to accomplish his supernatural destiny. But that is the Gospel, the practice of which, as we know, is entirely favourable to the temporal happiness of both individuals and of societies. It would be better then to say that the political and social role of the Poverello was to give the Gospel to souls.’(Omer Englebert; St.Francis, footnote 2, p.238 Burns and Oates, 1950)

Sadly this gift of the Gospel the Pope seems unable to manage. He does not give the Gospel to souls, but a social programme that is taken up with the plight of young people without jobs, the care of elderly, and the migrant crisis (The supposedly greatest catastrophe of the present era) all good things, but not ends in themselves, which is why his pontificate is so disastrous, and which unfortunately lends plausibility to the theory that the Jesuits are Machiavellian; namely that the end justifies the means. And so the Pope can appoint a priest as one of the consultors for the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, who has likened gay sex to the Eucharist, be close to Cardinal Daneels, a protector of sex abusers, and give back to the well known sex abuser Fr. Izzoli his right to practice his priesthood, which had rightly been taken away from him by Pope Benedict. Pope Francis then attacks Catholics just for being Catholics, as Matthew Schmitz noted in an op-ed in the New York Times last September, and which was quoted by the utterly admirable Steve Skojec in his brilliant article on Pope Francis in Onepeterfive only recently; entitled Four Years Later: Reflections on an Unprecedented Pontificate.


[Francis] describes parish priests as “little monsters” who “throw stones” at poor sinners. He has given curial officials a diagnosis of “spiritual Alzheimer’s.” He scolds pro-life activists for their “obsession” with abortion. He has said that Catholics who place an emphasis on attending Mass, frequenting confession, and saying traditional prayers are “Pelagians” — people who believe, heretically, that they can be saved by their own works.

Christ meets the individual and convicts them of sin, such as the woman at the well, and the woman taken in adultery, or Matthew the tax collector. He does not accompany the woman at the well and slowly gets her to get rid of her lover, nor does he say to the woman taken in adultery “There, there you didn’t really mean any harm, and adultery is so understandable and not such a big thing after all.” No! He tells the woman to go and sin no more, and he certainly doesn’t tell Matthew to remain where he is and try and make the tax gathering system more people friendly and less corrupt. He simply says “Follow Me.” precisely what he says to St. Francis and all the saints. So how has Pope Francis made such a huge and disastrous mistake in his conception of Christianity? It has been put with utter succinctness by Hieromonk Damascene in his massive biography of that great prophet to the Christian world of 20th century, Father Seraphim Rose:

The religion of the “Grand Inquisitor”, Eugene(Seraphim Rose) maintained, takes fundamental Christian values ---peace, brotherhood, unity, love --- and distorts them to be used for the furtherance of purely earthly aims. It does not do away with Christianity; it only reinterprets it, so thoroughly that sincere Christians are eventually led to work for the same goals as secular idealists to build their kingdom of heaven on earth. (Father Seraphim Rose, His Life and Works, Hieromonk Damascene; St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, p.242)

Returning to that marvellous character, and journalist cum prophet, Malcolm Muggeridge, it is good to remember that he never felt that he belonged in this world and this feeling went back to early childhood. Throughout his early life he had to struggle with his fairly appalling sensuality and hard drinking, allied to a world weary cynicism until he returned to Christ and realized that the flesh availeth naught.

In Eden Adam and Eve were, though physical, utterly permeated with the spiritual. They had no need for excitement, wonderful meals and a healthy sex life, which is neither healthy, nor fecund. In Paradise our first parents would have reproduced themselves in a totally different manner to the way we reproduce ourselves in the fallen world. All was bliss in Eden, but not excitement.

With the Fall, the longing for Heaven, a purely spiritual thing, has got muddled up with our fallen nature. We feel alien in the Fallen world, because that is the truth of the situation, but to escape this Fallen world we too often take the road of pleasure, which leads to Hell. Our longing for love and Heaven, our innate desire for God gets diverted into the pursuit of beauty and all that is seemingly good and ends in despair, and in our modern world this means a life steeped in drugs, drink, sexual perversion, and violence, which makes us even more aliens in an alien fallen world. The only way back to Paradise and to God is by living the life of the Spirit, living the life of the Gospel, and not living in an Utopia of social advancement, comfort and jobs for all, because after all, Jesus himself had no job, no home, and no comforts, so why should we cling so stubbornly to such things, and pursue them with a frenzy bordering on craziness? As Christians we should long to live in Christ’s company and imitate him as far as we are able.

So if the Pope really wants to change the world, I would suggest that he should look to reviving the Third Order of St. Francis with all the rigours of its original rule, and then we will really see the true reformation of a Church which looks as if it is about to die at the hands of priests and religious who have fallen in love with the contemporary world and who have rendered to Caesar what belongs to God, which is why so many of them have betrayed Christ, discarded their vows, and sold their souls to the World, the Flesh and the Devil, not realizing that in the Cross they will find joy inconceivable, love unimaginable, and life without end.








By The Hermits, Apr 9 2017 01:36PM

Well, as you may have read, we intended to stop our blog and just write occasional articles as we felt drawn to do so.

However, we have realized that it is much easier to use the blog tool rather than having to create new 'pages'.

Also, as things in the Church now are so serious and so dangerous, as to the transmission of the immemorial teachings, doctrines, and practice of the Church, we feel we must bring hope to the suffering and confused faithful.

So, blog, we have returned!

By The Hermits, Feb 4 2017 03:29PM

In recent months central Italy has been convulsed with earthquakes that have been likened, by those who have been hit by them, to scenes out of the Apocalypse. These rumblings and cracking of the earth ‘s surface reflect the rumblings and crackings that are going on in the Church. Never before in her history, even in the Arian crisis, has the confusion been so great. During the Arian Crisis there was the one undivided Church, and though there were small heretical groups, the Church was really dealing with just one opponent, Arius and his followers, but today the Church is like a sinking ship or more appropriately a collapsing building. She is like a dying man who is suffering from multiple organ failure, or someone who has numerous illnesses. Secularism, humanism, the Enlightenment have entered her body, the Faith is clouded, Dogma is dimmed, and most extraordinary of all, the integrity of the Papacy is being compromised by the Pope himself.


In these truly Apocalyptic times we must pray with Christ to the Father. As He did when he would spend nights alone in prayer to his Heavenly Father. We pray with him in his terrible Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane, and say over and over again “Not my will be done, but thine be done.”. We pray with Christ at the Last Supper, and we pray with him in his final and a terrible death agony on the Cross “Father forgive them for they know not what they do.” But especially we must pray as He taught us:


OUR FATHER WHO ART IN HEAVEN,

HALLOWED BE THY NAME.

THY KINGDOM COME. THY WILL BE DONE ON EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN.

GIVE US THIS DAY OUR DAILY BREAD.

AND FORGIVE US OUR TRESPASSES,

AS WE FORGIVE THOSE WHO TRESPASS AGAINST US.

AND LEAD US NOT INTO TEMPTATION.

BUT DELIVER US FROM EVIL


Let us also place ourselves under the great banner of Our Lady which is emblazoned with her Immaculate Heart, and where we see her foot crushing Satan’s head. And let us do all we can to promote the great devotion to The Divine Mercy, for it will be this devotion along with the rosary which will do more to save souls than all the different schools of prayer.


If we do this then, God willing, the attack on marriage and the Eucharist which has resulted from the ambiguities of Amoris Laetitia will be swept aside and the true understanding of marriage will be revealed. If it is not, then we will find ourselves back in 1535 when Henry VIII repudiated the Catholic Church and built his own Church on the foundations of adultery.


So, in the 100th anniversary of Our Lady’s apparitions at Fatima, let us make the First Five Saturdays, and let us beseech Our Lady to usher in her great reign of Peace. Christ who is the Way, the Truth and the Life will prevail, but he will need martyrs, victim souls, warriors and above all the prayers of children which are so pleasing to God, for it will be the truly humble souls who will bring down the powerful from their thrones and raise up the lowly. Then maybe we will see a rebirth of the ancient monastic and religious tradition that made England The Isle of Saints.



By The Hermits, Dec 11 2016 11:10AM

We have just celebrated the wonderful Feast of The Immaculate Conception, and we ponder Our Lady’s Immaculate conception where she was conceived without Original Sin and how only She and her Son, the New Adam who is both God and Man usher in the Redemption, and the recreation of Man in the image of God more perfectly and more mysteriously than if Adam and Eve had not fallen.

In Amoris Laeatitia the floodgates of the Liberal Dam have been opened, and we see the beginnings of the wreck of marriage, and the utter denigration of chastity. Now here’s the rub, and it is a very important one. The concept of chastity which has been so underplayed since Vatican II, has all but been forgotten in so much discourse. Just think that most of the women who joined religious life prior to Vatican II were virgins or widows, and note also that there were special orders formed for “Fallen Women” (On the basis of the present state of things, there should be thousands of convents for such women in the Western World. That would solve the vocations crises,for women at least.) One such order was founded by that most delightful of saints, St. Joseph Benedict Cottolengo, a contemporary of the great Don Bosco, and in some ways more extraordinary than him, but his story must be told at a later time.

With the underplaying of Virginity, there has been a concomitant down playing of chastity in marriage. St. Catherine of Siena said that many married people go the Hell because of sexual sins committed within the marriage bed. The one thing that couples do not need is “A healthy sexual life”. In the superb book by Archpriest Josiah B. Trenham of the Antiochian Orthodox Church entitled Marriage and Virginity, According to John Chrysostom (published by St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood) he relates a story, that I cannot put my finger on, which is embedded amidst Father Josiah’s fairly massive footnotes. It tells the story of an Orthodox bishop visiting a parish and being scandalized at a priest who has 10 children, and berates him for a far too active sex life for one who is a priest. The priest points out that he has only made love to his wife ten times, and so the bishop is gently rebuked.

In the early Church you often see many, many, couples, especially in the 4th and 5th centuries embracing perpetual continence and living as brother and sister; the most colourful must be St.Melania and her husband Pinanius, but that too is a tale for another time. However the most perfect marriage was the virginal marriage of Our Lady and St. Joseph, and the marriage had to be virginal not just for the very obvious reason that no man could enter the sanctuary of the Mother of God, for that was God’s domain and no-one else’s, but because they had to be totally absorbed with Jesus, the God Man. Marriage like, religious chastity and virginal chastity is about contemplating God with all the faculties of spirit, intellect and body. Marriage is not and end in itself but a means to contemplation in the World, and a way to Heaven. It is not about couples constantly taken up with themselves in a silly dream world, sentimental romances, or sexual shenanigans, it is a window into Heaven.

So the Pope and his advisors are missing the point. All remarried divorcees, when they come to the awful realization of what they have done, would welcome a life of perfect continence as that would be a life of penance, and a beautiful way to holiness, experienced by all those wonderful couples who throughout the ages have opted for perfect chastity within their, albeit, valid marriages. However as the Church just pays lip service to penance then this will uphill struggle, to say the very least.

The consequences of divorce are manifold, children are emotionally, psychologically, and even sexually wrecked, spouses shattered, not to mention financial problems accruing to the whole aea of maintenance. What is essential to marriage is not sexual attraction, a harmonious life between husband and wife, though that would be wonderful, but the begetting of children for Heaven, in a nutshell producing saints for God, something that St. Bernard’s parents, St.Dominic’s parents and St. Thérèse’s did superlatively well.

We should rejoice on this Gaudete Sunday when we think of great married people who decided to live as brother and sister, and show to divorced and remarried couples that they can live like these saints and so redeem the sin of adultery which is now rendered falsely innocuous under the name re-marriage; nothing could be more dangerous nor damnable than this.


Underneath I append important commentaries on the grave happenings within the Church.



Dubia debacle shows the Church is in a ‘religious civil war’, says famed Catholic historian

ROME, December 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Italian Catholic historian Roberto de Mattei has stated that Pope Francis’ refusal to answer questions by the four Cardinals about whether Amoris Laetitia conforms to Catholic teaching is itself “already an answer,” the implications of which, he says, indicates that the Catholic Church has entered into a “religious civil war.”

“This situation is so grave that a neutral position is no longer possible. Today we are in a war, a religious civil war,” de Mattei told LifeSiteNews in an exclusive interview in Rome last month.

“It is important to comprehend that today there is a clear choice between fidelity to the Church, to the perennial Magisterium, or infidelity, which means errors, heresy, and apostasy,” he said.

De Mattei, a professor at the European University of Rome and the president of the Lepanto Foundation, stated that there is “tremendous confusion inside the Church” caused by the pope’s ambiguous moral teaching, especially as found in his April exhortation Amoris Laetitia, which he said has caused “division” and “fragmentation” among bishops, priests, and the faithful.

The exhortation specifically has been criticized by faithful Catholics for undermining the indissolubility of marriage, opening a door for couples in adulterous relationships to receive Holy Communion, and for making conscience the final arbiter of morality. As some critics feared, the exhortation is already being used by some liberal bishops to welcome openly homosexual “families” into parishes and for allowing adulterous couples to receive Holy Communion in certain cases.

When the four Cardinals privately asked the pope in September — following a standard procedure within the Church — whether the exhortation conforms to Catholic teaching on marriage, the sacraments, and conscience, the pope failed to answer their questions.

Specifically, they asked: 1) whether adulterers can receive Holy Communion; 2) whether there are absolute moral norms that must be followed “without exceptions;” 3) if habitual adultery is an “objective situation of grave habitual sin;” 4) whether an intrinsically evil act can be turned into a “‘subjectively’ good” act based on “circumstances or intentions;” and 5) if, based on “conscience,” one can act contrary to known “absolute moral norms that prohibit intrinsically evil acts.”

The cardinals then went public with their questions last month, only to receive harsh criticism from high-ranking prelates, including two who were recently made cardinals by Pope Francis. The four stand accused of being “troublesome,” in need of “conversion,” of committing “apostasy” and “scandal,” of giving the pope a “slap in the face,” and of creating “difficulty and division.”

But de Mattei argued that it was not the four cardinals who created the problem, but the pope.

“The cause of this confusion, the author of this confusion is not the four cardinals, of course. I think that the main author of the confusion is Pope Francis, because it is since his pontificate that things go so rapidly, so fast,” he said. “It seems sometimes that he likes to create this confusion.”

De Mattei said that the cardinals acted in a “perfect way from a canonical point of view” when they submitted their five questions (dubia) to the pope.

“I consider it very grave the fact that the Pope, who is the supreme head of the congregation, didn't want to answer. This is already an answer, in fact,” he said.

De Mattei called it “very opportune” for the cardinals to pursue what one of them —Cardinal Burke — called a “formal act of correction” of the errors found in the Pope’s exhortation.

“The importance of this initiative is not only to warn the Pope about the errors found in Amoris Laetitia, but also to warn the faithful, to inform the faithful, because among the faithful there is confusion but there is also ignorance. And I think that we have the duty to make the faithful aware of the gravity of this situation,” he said.

“This situation is so grave that a neutral position is no longer possible. Today we are in a war, a religious civil war, unfortunately. I don't like this war, but we are engaged in it against our will. We have not created the situation, but this situation obliges everyone to pursue a clear position. And for this, I think we have to thank the four cardinals for their courage and to push them to continue their action and their witness,” he added.





Magisterium ‘debased’ by pope’s ‘refusal to answer’ four Cardinals: famed German philosopher

December 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — The foremost Roman Catholic philosopher in Germany has come out in support of the four Cardinals who asked Pope Francis to clarify ambiguities in his Apostolic Exhortation regarding the sacraments for divorced and remarried Catholics.

“It is deplorable that only four Cardinals have taken the initiative regarding this topic,” Robert Spaemann said in defense of the dubia voiced by four Cardinals.

In an interview with the Italian Nuova Bussola Quotidiana (New Daily Compass) on December 4, Spaemann underlined that the four who brought forth the dubia were correct in addressing the worldwide perplexity that Amoris Laetitia created in the episcopate.

Spaemann is famous for his philosophical work on Christian ethics, bioethics, and human rights. He is a personal friend of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and professor emeritus of Munich’s Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. He has already expressed his concern about the ambiguity of Amoris Laetitia, calling it a “breach with Catholic Tradition.”

“With the dubia, the Cardinals take on their proper duty to sustain with their council – insofar as they are ‘senators’ – the Church in the person of the Holy Father. […] The four Cardinals have chosen the right path,” Spaemann explained.

Recently the highest protector of the Faith, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith suggested that the Pope could consult his congregation to resolve the ambiguity. Spaemann added that the dubia should have gone to the CDF. “The first addressee of the dubia is the Pope, although in my opinion the writing should have passed through the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith.”

Regarding the silence of Pope Francis, who has hitherto not answered the Cardinals, Spaemann wrote: “The Pope’s refusal to answer the appeal of the four Cardinals fills me with great worry since, in a certain way, the supreme Magisterium in this case is being debased. The Pope clearly has a deep aversion to these decisions in which a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ is required.”

Spaemann emphasized that Christ’s way does entail a clear true-false distinction: Where on the one hand Pope Francis hesitates, “Christ, the Lord of the Church, on the other hand, always gives to His disciples a decision of the kind. In the specific question regarding adultery, he ‘shocks’ the apostles with the simplicity and clarity of his teaching.”

The third doubt addressed if it is still “possible to affirm that a person who habitually lives in contradiction to a commandment of God’s law, as for instance the law that prohibits adultery (Matthew 19:3-9), finds him or herself in an objective situation of grave habitual sin.” Spaemann argued against the subjectivist understanding of the discernment of conscience: “It is a grave error to think that subjectivity is the last criterion for the administration of the sacraments. It is also true that every action that goes against one conscience is evil but one can also act according to an erroneous conscience. This is the clear teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas.”

If a person finds himself in a situation that is perplexing (casus perplexus), a situation in which the person has to choose between two or more moral evils whereupon he would either go against his conscience or against the norm, in this case “from this dilemma one can only come out through ‘conversion,’ that is an opening of the conscience towards objective truth. The place of renewal of the truth is on the one hand reason, on the other hand Revelation.”

The interview ended with an appeal from the Gospel of John (6:67): “‘Will you also go away?’ This is the question Jesus gives His disciples as the crowd leaves after having heard the words of Jesus. Peter does not discuss, but only asks: ‘To whom shall we go? Only you have the words of eternal life.’ (John 6:68)”



Openly gay theologian defends four Cardinals: ‘I want a Church that speaks plainly’

December 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — In the wake of harsh rebukes from cardinals and other churchmen over the dubia to the pope, German Cardinal Joachim Meisner has received unlikely support from one of his past adversaries.

“The situation never before existed in this kind of dimension,” theologian David Berger wrote on his website. “They [the Cardinals] are hushed up in order to implement plans that contradict the Church’s teaching on marriage while the secular media applauds.”

“The most ardent preachers of tolerance are almost always intolerant people,” he added, citing German philosopher, Walter Hoeres.

David Berger might be one of the most controversial figures in recent times. He made a name for himself as a Catholic theologian and Thomist until publicly coming out as a practicing homosexual in 2010. This led to the Church’s revocation of his license to teach (missio canonica) by Cardinal Meisner, who thought this act necessary because Berger “does not seem to conform to the norms of the Church in teaching and way of life.”

At the time, the theologian called the revocation a “heavy smash” against peace in the diocese. Today, his words are supportive of Cardinal Meisner. “While in my life I had to experience the hard hand of Meisner, I am most ashamed as a Catholic and theologian for this conduct [of Msgr. Vito Pinto] that would punish [the Cardinals] for holding on to a core teaching of Catholic thought.”

Berger was referring to a report that Msgr. Pinto had said the pope could remove the four Cardinals' red hats over the dubia. But the news agency, Religión Confidencial, has since corrected the report and indicated that Msgr. Pinto had actually said the pope would not remove them as cardinals. Msgr. Pinto then redoubled his rebuke of the four Cardinals in an interview last week.

“Even though the Rota has backpedaled and now gives the impression that everything was a misunderstanding, I know that nothing is published by the Vatican by accident. It was supposed to test the waters, how far they could go,” Berger explained to LifeSiteNews on December 1.

“Those who were at a disadvantage under Pope Benedict seem to want revenge,” he noted. “Cardinal (Raymond) Burke and Meisner are welcome targets. One knows you can shoot at them without Pope Francis stepping in. The attackers give the impression that they fight for tolerance and openness, but they fight with the most despicable and intolerant means.”

Regarding his own dispute with Cardinal Meisner in the past, he added: “I cannot have an opinion in the discussion [today] based on my bad experience with him. That would be pure subjectivism. The question is if Meisner and Burke [and the other Cardinals] are right or not.”

Regarding the dubia, Berger voiced his support, explaining that Amoris Laetitia wants to get rid of everything that is against the the spirit of the times. “Now there is a wish to abolish central core elements of the Church’s moral teaching – which are irritating for the Zeitgeist – and Amoris Laetitia is a welcome ground for that. The intention [of those who hold this view] is that the Church’s teaching should be changed. That some Cardinals fight against this by signing the dubia is not just their right but their duty. Their office urges them to fight for the integrity of the Church’s teaching on faith and morals until their blood is spilled.”

“And I am happy about it. The Church was not founded by Christ as a wellness center,” he added. “I prefer a Church that scolds me than a Church which mendaciously says yes to me and teaches me the Zeitgeist while making itself laughable and superfluous.”

These words gain particular importance coming from Berger, who has strongly criticized the Church and clergy with statements such as “20 to 40 percent of Catholic clergy are homosexual” and with publications such as his book, Der heilige Schein (The Holy Sham: A Gay Theologian in the Catholic Church). He remains active in the homosexual scene, working as editor-in-chief of gaystream.eu while also writing politically and socio-political minded articles in The Huffington Post and the German disputation newspaper Junge Freiheit.

“I want a Church that speaks plainly. At the same time, I uphold the Catholic motto fortiter in re, suaviter in modo [stronger in matter, sweeter in manner]. As opposed to Islam, the Catholic Church refuses homosexuality, but she would never demand the death penalty for homosexuals."

“In recent years, I have experienced very respectful dealings with me as a homosexual by Church prelates. The Church also respects the forum internum and does not ask about things that belong in the Confessional. Therefore, I can respect her call for abstinence, which could also target married people, etc. Though when holding the mirror up to me, I do not always give a good image, I defend the doctrine unmistakably that there cannot be sacramental homosexual marriage (that would be a simulatio sacramenti).”

Instead, he called for dialogue when possible. “I see many points where homosexuals and pro-lifers could work together — and they already do here in Berlin and in the USA, for example regarding PID [pre-implantation diagnostics].”

Berger also made headlines in 2012, saying Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI was gay. On August 26 of this year, he apologized publicly to Benedict XVI on his website. “I realized what kind of awful game I had taken part in and I was ashamed. And then I apologized,” Berger said to LifeSiteNews. “He has defended the Church’s teaching in a highly intelligent and uncompromising way. That why I learned to hate the media and everything bad that has been said about [Pope Benedict] – no matter if true or not.”

Berger concluded with his support of the dubia. “I hope that Pope Francis does not gamble with the unity of the Church, only to appease a few liberal Catholics. Those are Catholics who use the Eucharist – the most sacred thing in the militant Church – in their fight for recognition of divorce as a means to an end.”


Bishop Schneider: ‘We are witnessing today a strange form of schism’ within the Church

December 8, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – "A certain kind of schism already exists in the Church," Bishop Athanasius Schneider said, and it consists of those who align themselves with the pope to advance their careers yet reject Christ's fundamental teachings on marriage.

Schneider, the Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Maria Santissima in Astana, Kazakhstan told this to TV Libertes in an interview addressing Amoris Laetitia and Schneider's support of the four cardinals' dubia to the pope asking for moral clarification.

"My questioning of Amoris Laetitia first of all concerns the very concrete question of admitting so-called ‘remarried’ divorces to Holy Communion," he explained. "In fact, during the last two synods on the family and after the publication of Amoris Laetitia, there was and continues to be to this day an arduous and tumultuous fight about this conrete question."

"All these ecclesiastics who want another gospel, meaning a right-to-divorce gospel, a gospel of sexual liberty, in short, a Gospel without God's sixth commandment...make use of all evil means, that is to say ruses, deceptions, masterful rhetoric and dialectics, and even the tactic of intimidation and moral violence in order to attain their goal of admitting so-called ‘remarried’ divorces to Holy Communion, without the latter fulfilling the condition of living in perfect continence, a condition requied by divine law," said Schneider. "Once the objective is attained, even if limited to so-called exceptional cases of discernment, the door is opened to introducing the gospel of divorce, the gospel without the sixth commandment. And this will no longer be the Gospel of Jesus, but an anti-gospel, a gospel according to this world, even if such a gospel is cosmetically embellished with terms such as 'mercy,' 'maternal solicitude' or 'accompaniment.'"

Citing St. Paul's letter to the Galatians, Schneider reminded the faithful that someone who "preaches a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you" is "anathema."

"On the subject of doctrine and practice concerning the sacrament of marriage, and the perennial validity of the moral law, we are witnessing in our times an ambiguity of such scope only comparable to the general confusion of the Arian crisis of the fourth century," Schneider warned.

If the dubia remain unanswered, he said, and "if the pope does not fulfill his task in the current circumstances, the bishops have to indefectibly preach the unchanging Gospel concerning the divine doctrine of morality and the perennial discipline of marriage, coming fraternally in this way to help the pope even, because the pope is not a dictator."

Disputes over the indissolubility of marriage and sacramental practice aren't only a risk, but a reality, he continued. Schneider stated:

It is not only a risk of schism, but a certain kind of schism already exists in the Church. In Greek, schism means to separate oneself from the totality of the body. Christ is the totality of the body of Divine Truth, and unity in His supernatural body is also visible. But we are witnessing today a strange form of schism. Externally, numerous ecclesiastics safeguard formal unity with the pope, at times, for the good of their own career or or of a kind of papolatry. And at the same time they have broken their ties with Christ, the Truth, and with Christ, the true head of the Church. On the other hand there are ecclesiastics who are denounced as schismatics despite the fact they live in canonical peace with the pope and remain faithful to Christ, the Truth, by assiduously promoting His Gospel of Truth.

It is evident that those who are internally the true schismatics, in relation to Christ, make use of calumnies for the sole purpose of silencing the voice of Truth by absurdly projecting their own state of internal schism on those ecclesiastics, who, regardless of praise or rebuke, defend the divine truths. In fact, as Sacred Scripture says, the word of Divine Truth is not bound. Even if a number of high-ranking officials in the Church today temporarily obscure the truth of the doctrine of marriage and its perennial discipline, this doctrine and discipline will always remain unchangeable in the Church, because the Church is not human foundation, but a divine one.

The bishop stressed the importance of praying for the pope and pointed out, "In Pope Francis’s words, he made [it] clear he did not have the intention of putting forward his own magisterial teaching" with the exhortation.







RSS Feed

Web feed

Gustave_Doré_-_Death_on_the_Pale_Horse_(1865)

The Hermit's Blog

Someone has told us that the contact page is not working. I have removed it to try and fix it.

 

So, if you want to contact us, or send us a donation to alow us to build the hermitage, (we are still living in old mobile homes that leak), our details are as follows:

 

The Hermitage,

Rapness,

Westray,

Orkney.

KW17 2DE

 

fleurdelyshermit@gmail.com